Sightings, real or not, make Bigfoot legend live on

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

Columbia Police Department is investigating a slew of Bigfoot sightings near the Pearl River, according to The Columbian-Progress.

The police chief indicated he believes it’s a hoax, but it makes you wonder, “What if it’s not?”

The next time I’m sitting in the deer stand and it’s dark and murky, I will probably spot one.

And then like the hundreds of other witnesses to the cultural phenomenon will have no tangible proof, and then everyone will think I’m crazy.

I first learned of Bigfoot while watching TV in my camp amid the swamps. It’s way out there - 30 minutes from the nearest Piggly Wiggly and just one bar with Verizon Wireless. And what pops on the TV, a Bigfoot special. Scared me to death.

I almost forgot about sasquatch (well, minus those beef jerky commercials) until some friends from Columbia were talking about it last week.

And as God as my witness, one of friends went out searching for it last week.

Let me tell you about Laura. I just met her two weeks ago, a friend of a friend. She lives in the outskirts of Columbia, and every evening, she sits on her porch with a cigarette, listening to the cackle of her police scanner.

I knew instantly she was my kind of person.

She didn’t find Bigfoot, but she did discover a track. No lies.

I wanted to make Mississippi famous, something other than Frank Melton stories.

I called CNN; no bites. I called Fox News; they said they couldn’t cover it because it could mock their viewers.

So, I decided I would write about it.

You may think I am kidding about the whole thing. No, it’s on the Progress’ Web site now. And even better, the police chief said “an out-of-state organization had visited the area with specialized equipment for primate study and had found no evidence of anything unusual.”

I know what you’re thinking; I looked into the matter.

All Fritscher family members are accounted for, and none have passed through the Columbia area. I have some beastly aunts and uncles - quite possibly science’s link between us humans and the homanids.

During my research of Bigfoot, I stumbled upon some nifty facts (all from the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization):

  • Mississippi has had 18 sightings confirmed by the BFRO. The BFRO’s Web site said it investigates sightings and only posts information of likely ones.
  • No sightings in Rankin County, unfortunately. Maybe the county’s icy law enforcement officials act as a deterrent. Or maybe Bigfoot just plain prefers cocktails over beer.
  • Clark and Lauderdale counties lead the state in sightings with three each.
  • Bigfoots are not dangerous, says the BFRO’s Web site. But sometimes they can get territorial and stalk people, which - allegedly - spooks off humans. They do eat aggressive pets though.

    It does make me wonder why, despite hundreds of sightings, that tangible evidence has never been left behind. Although most sightings are reported along the Pacific Coast (469 in Washington and 411 in California), you think someone in the South would’ve trapped one.

    Why hasn’t anyone in Columbia trapped it or at least got close enough to snap a photo?

    Whether it’s a hoax, folklore or the imagination of some crafty individuals - sightings, real or not, make the legend live on.

    Maybe the Columbia Bigfoot will wander up the Pearl and pay Rankin a visit. Perhaps a stop in Flowood for some newly legalized fire water on the rocks.

    Maybe they are out there; they may just be that good.

    Source: rankinledger

  • Update me when site is updated


    Big Foot In Santa Cruz Mountains?

    Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

    FELTON, Calif.,- Deep in the heart of the Santa Cruz Mountains exists a place where a legend  lives.

    In parts of the world it is known as the Yeti, in others it’s Sasquatch, but just about everyone at some point or another has heard of Big Foot.

    The question is, does Big Foot really exist in the Santa Cruz Mountains?

    Perhaps one location that you can find the answers ist the Big Foot Discovery Project Museum located in Felton. Operator Michael Rug has devoted the past 50 years in researching the elusive creature. After having experienced a sighting as a child he says they can and do exist.

    “We’ve had about four dozen reports come in, and I’m quite confident that some of those are bogus. Some people are seeing black bears and mistaking them for big foot, some people are not seeing anything at all, it’s there imagination getting carried away, and we’ve even had a few hoaxes pop up. To me that means we have a genuine subset of the big foot phenomenon right here in Santa Cruz,” says Rug.

    When asked what he thinks of people who do not believe there is anything strange living the Santa Cruz Mountains, he says: “I say to people, try to put yourself in my shoes. You see something, it registers in your brain with your two eyes, and it says there is a large bi-pedal primate walking through the woods.”

    Source: kcba


    Update me when site is updated



    Bigfoot? UFOs? Bunch of bunk

    Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters, Myths  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

    A large, mysterious primate roams the forests of the Bulkley Valley, leaving only the occasional footprint. Meanwhile, alien ships probe our skies, disappearing with hardly a trace,

    At least this is what a growing number of Bulkley Valley people believe. But according to a few top scientists in British Columbia, the probability any of these claims are true is virtually nil.

    Last fall, continuing throughout this winter, there were repeated reports of Bigfoot and UFO sightings from Moricetown to Burns Lake.

    In fact, Mormon missionaries documented large footprints and no less than a dozen reliable people contacted this newspaper from an area near Moricetown and Houston with photos and accounts of an unexplainable figure seemingly making tracks near their homes.

    And then there were those of incredible veracity, some in positions of great responsibility, living in Smithers, who reported seeing those infamous lights in the Bulkley Valley sky.

    However, Douglas Scott is a professor of astrophysics at the University of British Columbia who is fairly confident alien species exist somewhere in the universe. But given its immense size, he says it is extremely unlikely they’ve been popping in to visit us.

    “The basic thing is it’s fantastically difficult to visit other stars. Somewhere out there there are probably other living beings of some sort. But the distances are huge,” Scott says.

    Even traveling at the speed of light, which is impossible according to the laws of physics, it would take four years to reach the nearest star, Proxima Centauri. That means even if humans managed to build a spacecraft that could travel as fast as 30,000 km in one second, our astronauts would be in for a 40 year trip.

    Even getting to Mars is very difficult, Scott adds. “Going to a star is something like 100,000 times harder. It’s not just a bit harder.”

    Aliens would have similar difficulties. But again, he stresses that he doesn’t discount the possibility of extraterrestrial life altogether.

    “I just refuse to believe that aliens zip around the Earth, like they were coming here on a whim. If somebody has some real evidence I would be the first to be really excited and want to know more. But the stuff you hear about, there’s never any hard evidence.”

    As for the possibility of a large primate stomping around in the forests of British Columbia, Dr. Jacob Goheen, an assistant professor of zoology at UBC who studies the natural history of mammals, scoffs at the very idea.

    “I hardly know where to begin,” he says. “First of all, there aren’t any other apes in the western hemisphere. And one kind of pattern we see among mammals is that in like species, their geographical ranges overlap. The second thing is that it’s hard to imagine a species of that size going undetected for that long.”

    Goheen says the act of searching for hypothetical animals cannot be considered science. People involved in scientific research unanimously reject the existence of crypto-animals like Bigfoot, he says, and people who claim they do exist don’t have bona fide scientific credentials.

    “You will not find a biologist who believes in these things and biologists are the experts. So that should tell you something. I hate to sound kind of snooty there, but it would be like asking a professional actor about how we should construct a bridge rather than a civil engineer.”

    In any case, a large primate would have a very hard time surviving in the forests of Northwestern B.C., Goheen adds, knowing what we do about the diet of other species of apes. “Chimpanzees and ourangutans eat fruits mainly. Gorillas eat leaves but they spend all day eating.”

    “There are very few mammals that can make a living eating conifer leaves. It’s really bad stuff — they’re toxic. There are no primates I’ve ever heard of eating those.”

    In any case, Goheen says, crypto-zoologists are so off their rockers that they are hardly worth responding to. They don’t have anything valuable to add to the current body of knowledge, he says.

    “A debate is only a good debate if both sides have something to contribute. For example, we don’t debate that storks carry babies to our doorsteps. Even though you could argue that, you would just be insane.”

    But is it true that people who believe they have sighted Bigfoot don’t have all their marbles?

    Not necessarily, according to Dr. Paul D. Siakaluk, associate professor of psychology at the University of Northern British Columbia. Siakaluk says some people have such strongly held beliefs that they will flat-out refuse to accept evidence that challenges them, no matter how convincing.

    “People are more interested in and will only accept information that’s consistent with their belief structure already. So, if they don’t believe or understand that time travel is impossible…. then they will disregard any information or knowledge that’s presented to them. They will only accept information that would be consistent with what they believe.”

    Many people have pre-conceived notions of what alien craft should look like. For example, flying saucers, a staple of science-fiction, are commonly reported by UFO sighters, he says. “The idea that there would be some disc-shaped light object is what we refer to as a schema”, Siakaluk says. A `schema’ is a term used in psychology that means a set of beliefs or expectations about something in the world.

    Siakaluk also says some people are more prone to believing in pseudoscience than others. “People do differ in ­— perhaps a bad term ­— in terms of gullibility.”

    The bottom line, say Scott and Goheen, is that anyone making a paranormal claim should get ready to prove it.

    Scott recalls a saying popular among skeptics: “The most extraordinary claims require the most extraordinary evidence. The crazier the thing you’re claiming is the better your evidence should be,” he says.

    “If you really did see a UFO, try to get some really good evidence.”

    And taking better photographs and videos would be a good start, says Goheen.

    “Invariably when people see Bigfoot they never have a camera. Except this really grainy photo of some dude dressed in a gorilla costume.”

    Source: bclocalnews

    Update me when site is updated


    The Lone Star Bigfoot

    Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

    In 2000, residents of Sabine reported seeing a gray, ape-like creature in the area’s dense forests. The local newspaper dubbed the creature the “Sabine Thing”.

    A similar beast called the “Caddo Critter” is said to have inhabited the bottoms around scenic Caddo Lake in the 1970’s. The Sulphur River along the Texas-Arkansas border has been a source of similar sightings for decades.

    As strange as those stories may sound, they are not the only cases of mysterious ape-like animal sightings in Texas, not by a long shot. “Bigfoot” (a.k.a. “Sasquatch”) is a term associated with the US Pacific Northwest, but a handful of investigators are searching for the same (or very similar) animal right here in the Lone Star State.

    Bobby Hamilton of Warren is founder of the Gulf Coast Bigfoot Research Organization (GCBRO), a group dedicated to solving these mysteries in Texas and elsewhere. “I know it sounds crazy, but there are Bigfoot creatures right here in Texas,” Hamilton said. “That’s a lot to swallow, but I’ve been researching these creatures in the field for quite some time now. They’re out there.”

    Something Hamilton likes to make clear up front is that his organization believes these creatures are real flesh and blood animals, not part of some paranormal government conspiracy. “They’re flesh and blood animals. We don’t believe they are flying around in UFOs or are shapeshifters or anything like that. In fact, we don’t allow anyone into our group who talks about that kind of stuff. We believe these animals to be a primate, a very smart primate that we just haven’t yet proven exists.”

    The GCBRO keeps a log of sightings by county in Texas and other states, and according to Hamilton, reports come in on a weekly basis. “Some of them are recent reports while others may be 30 years old,” he said. “But they all tell us something. If an area has a bunch of sightings over a long period of time we know that’s a good area to research.”

    Researching an area consists of looking for sign like footprints and twisted limbs and listening for vocalizations. “We have recorded some noises we just can’t place with known animals. Some of these sounds are pretty amazing, even frightening,” Hamilton said.

    The group has even found some hair samples. Primatologists who examined the samples said they were from “no known animal.” One came back as matching alleged Bigfoot hair gathered in the Pacific Northwest.

    Beyond gathering physical evidence of the creatures’ existence, Hamilton said some in his group have had close encounters. “There are people within our group who have seen these creatures, myself included. Some joined the group because they saw one and others have seen them in the course of research.”

    Craig Woolheater is a researcher for the Texas Bigfoot Research Center (TBRC), another group studying the Bigfoot phenomenon. “Several of our members have seen these creatures, and that’s a big part of the reason we’re so passionate about studying them. It’s one thing to read about them, but another to see them,” he said.

    Woolheater’s sighting occurred while he and his wife were traveling through Louisiana one night in the early 1990’s. “This big, grayish, hairy creature was on the side of the road. It was dark, but we got a good look at it. The beast was kind of slumped over,” he said.

    TBRC members believe the creatures are a subspecies of the ones in the Pacific Northwest. “The basic reports are the same-a large, hairy animal walking upright,” Woolheater said. “But there are some differences, like coloration, hair length and build. Until it’s proven they exist, all of that’s kind of a moot point. This is certainly cryptozoology’s biggest mystery.”

    Loren Coleman, considered by many to be the world’s foremost cryptozoologist, notes that there have been several discoveries of large animals in recent years. “A new species of antelope was found in Vietnam a few years ago. Tales of the mountain gorilla used to be greeted with the same kind of disdain as modern day mystery primate sightings. One day we may find out these creatures are real too.”

    Coleman, who along with Patrick Hughye wrote “A Field Guide to Bigfoot , Yeti and other Mystery Primates” , said there are plenty of historical references of apelike creatures in the South, both from European and Native American culture. “The Louisiana Choctaw Indian had an animal they called the nalusa fayala, which means ‘long, evil being,” he said.

    The most famous Southern Bigfoot sightings came from just across the border on the Arkansas side of the Sulphur River near the tiny community of Fouke. The “Fouke Monster,” as the creature was called by locals, achieved celluloid immortality in the 1973 film, The Legend of Boggy Creek. Smokey Crabtree was a wildlife advisor for the film, and his family accounted for several of the sighting reenactments. He has authored two books, Smokey and the Fouke Monster and Too Close to the Mirror, and believes there are such creatures roaming the southern bottomlands. According to him, the filmmakers did not tell the whole story, or at least did not tell it accurately.

    “A lot of people got the impression after watching the movie that the creature was mean and aggressive, but in my experience it wasn’t,” he said. “There were other inaccuracies, which is why I wrote Smokey and the Fouke Monster.”

    Being a cryptozoology buff, I jumped on the opportunity to drive up to Fouke and visit with Crabtree. I interviewed him at his home and then went for a walk along the banks of Boggy Creek. I felt like a kid watching The Legend of Boggy Creek for the first time.

    One thing I always wondered is why the creature in the film was never referred to as a “Bigfoot,” as most mysterious North American primates seem to get tagged.

    “At the time Bigfoot was something that was known of in the Pacific Northwest and in a lot of ways the area of Fouke was sheltered from that part of the world,” Crabtree said. “We never heard of Bigfoot, but we knew something strange was going on around our little community.”

    How did Crabtree, a lifelong hunter, fisherman and trapper, react when he first heard of the creature? “My son came home one day saying he saw this big, hairy creature in the woods behind where we lived,” he said. “I could tell he was dead serious too, and this bothered me. I had never known my son to lie, but I just couldn’t believe there might be something like that out in the woods I had hunted and trapped in my whole life.

    “After awhile, older members of my family started coming to me and saying my son wasn’t lying. They had seen such a creature in the area in years past but swore to never tell. However, they felt they had to let me know my son was telling the truth.”

    After that, even common incidents in the woods took on new significance for Crabtree. “I started looking back to things that happened to me out in the woods and in the bottoms in the past, and wondered if something strange had really occurred,” he said.

    One thing most cryptozoologists agree on is that if such a creature existed in the Fouke area, there must have been more than one of them. The natural question, therefore, regards recent sightings.

    “We get reports from time to time,” Crabtree said. “In fact, a few years ago I got a report from several different people who reported seeing a large hairy creature off of Highway 71. Three motorists saw this thing on the side of the road at the same time, and on the same night a lady who had no knowledge of the other sightings reported seeing the same thing in the same general area.”

    Do a handful of these creatures roam the vast woodlands of the Lone Star State? Well, no one has proven it. Then again, no one has disproven it either.

    Think about that the next time you are in the woods alone and that creepy feeling comes over you.

    by Chester Moore

    anomalist.com/reports/lonestar.html

    Update me when site is updated