Bigfoot: Man, Beast or Alien? We May Never Know.

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

Ape-man or extra-terrestrial? Research across the globe is sketchy at best when it comes to what this creature known by many names may be. Many great researchers have come to conclusions and/or reached milestones that give an insight to the possible answer to this ages old question: What is Sasquatch- man, beast, or alien?

Though many believe that this creature is flesh and blood of the primate family, the truth remains the same. No one has proof positive of any single theory that answers the question. Many believe other wise, that this thing is not a creature of the primate family, but rather a flesh and blood creature of the alien nature. Even so, some believe he is neither primate nor flesh and blood .The possibility of an alien also strikes out with some. All that most of us can do is theorize about what he may be, even if we have seen one.

No one has ever captured a Bigfoot/Sasquatch for definite scientific study. There have been claims of a youth captured in the 1800’s, only to escape, and then there has been film that captures the eye of the researcher such as the Patterson film. No matter how we look at these claims from any perspective, nothing can be proven positively beyond a doubt without the carcass or living being in front of our eyes for extended and exhaustive research. Without seeing this creature, we simply can only guess whether or not it’s real and at best give theory a try.

Hair samples that go unidentified or unclassified also elude the burden of proof. Though some footprints retrieved appear to be real, there are too many that are just plain hoaxed. The blatant act of hoaxing does more to create a rift in the scientific field, especially when those who claim to have seen one, get caught or admit to hoaxing tracks or even a Bigfoot body for that matter. It seems pretty harsh to consider the Patterson film as proof of a specimen as well, when it is a film and not a three dimensional in your face proof of this being a primate, etc. No one can say whether it is a man in a costume, primate or alien for that matter. This creature was not captured. No DNA was taken. He eluded a blood test.

I will say that most people, who happen to research this creature, do so from there own perspective. Whether your from an Indian tribe that calls them Stick People,Demons and/or Gods, or you are from a college with all of the degrees and doctorates in a special field every documented suggestion or piece of the puzzle leads to one final conclusion that is yet to be had amongst the many witnesses and researchers in the field of Bigfoot. At this point in time that final conclusion can not be made. I will tell you why.

The Bigfoot / Sasquatch /Yeti / Skunk Ape, etc, etc has been seen for thousands of years. I have never heard of or seen a Bigfoot skeleton. I have never seen this beast in captivity. I have never seen proof of him/her but with my own eyes, and I am sure that I saw something that resembles the Patterson beast and also the flying Humanoid from the Rense.com photos of the New Mexico Flying Humanoid. Still it is not proof, nor have I been able to prove it was a Bigfoot or an Alien. Two distinct creatures that from behind, look exactly alike, can only lead me to guess at what this thing may be. Like I have always said. We do not know for fact (unless of course some agency does know and hides it) what exactly these mysterious beings are. I tend to think he is an extraterrestrial over the basic primate. We may never know if such creatures were created on earth or in the heavens above, but some day we just might know with some deeper research and destined luck. What ever the truth is, you have to ask your self if God did not create these beings to be seen by the men of earth with awe.

I part with my favorite passages that possibly sheds light on this mystery and equals all perspective to the possibility that there are descendants of a special race, be it a primate, human or an alien. It is from deep within the Old Testament of the Bible:

Genesis 6:4 ‘There were Giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.’

We all came from the cave on up right? Evolved or seeded, it may be one in the same from both sides of the fence. Ape-man, Cave man, Space man. It’s just one BIG Grey area and truth is yet to be proven.

groundreport.com/World/Bigfoot-Man-Beast-or-Alien-We-May-Never-Know_2

Update me when site is updated


Can Bigfoot hear cameras ?

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

I would like to answer some questions that have been raised concerning cameras and if they make high pitched sounds that humans cannot hear. The simple answer is YES!

Many types of electronics devices such as surveillance cameras, tape recorders, camcorders as well as other kinds of electronics produce measurable sound in the ultrasonic range. The ultrasonic sounds are produced at the electronic component/circuit board level. Even small electrical components soldered to a circuit board can transmit their ultrasonic vibrations through to the circuit board they are mounted to causing the circuit board to vibrate and produce ultrasonic sounds. I have demonstrated this process at Eric Altman’s East Coast Bigfoot Conference as well as Don Keating’s Ohio Conference.

I have been working on this concept since I saw a deer looking into one of my remotely deployed video cameras back in 1997. The deer in question tripped the surveillance system and it started to record the black and white video as well as audio. The recording showed the deer looking directly at the camera from about 15 feet away, during this time the deer kept twitching its ears and it was obvious the deer was hearing something produced by the camera.

Soon after reviewing the video footage, I conducted a search on deer hearing. I found that deer can hear into the ultrasonic range as well as many other animals. After that, I searched, found and purchased a device that can detect ultrasonic sound and convert that sound into audio we humans can hear and record. The camera used in that particular surveillance system was tested and it did in fact produce ultrasonic sounds I was able to measure and document. The sounds you hear are high pitched and mixed with various tones, similar to the sound of bees around a bee hive.

As some people have stated, they can hear high pitched sounds in some electronic equipment, this is not uncommon.

So yes, some electronic equipment produces high pitched ultrasonic sound we can measure and document.

Can the Bigfoot creatures hear these sounds? I don’t think anyone can answer that question right now.

Hopefully, the new EyeGotcha camera systems I am building will not produce ultrasonic sounds and catch these creatures off guard. The camera systems will be going on sale in the spring, starting a manufacturing business of this magnitude takes time and money, but it’s almost ready to go.

~ William M. Dranginis

cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-cameras

Update me when site is updated



Scholars Urge More Research on Holy Grail

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Myths  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

VALENCIA, Spain - Though no one knows if Valencia’s grail is the true Last Supper chalice, a group of experts says it has tremendous cultural value due to its impact on history and literature.

This was affirmed by members of the international congress “Valencia, City of the Holy Grail,” focusing on the chalice traditionally associated with the institution of the Eucharist. The congress was held Nov. 7-9 at the Catholic University of Valencia and was organized by the Archdiocese of Valencia, the cathedral’s metropolitan chapter, the Catholic University of Valencia, the Spanish Center for Sindonology, the Royal Brotherhood, and the Holy Chalice Confraternity.

Experts from several countries attended the congress. They gave presentations on the ways in which this relic has marked history and literature since its move from Rome to Spain by Lawrence the Martyr in the year 258, as held by tradition. The body of existing data points to the Valencia grail as the most probable authentic chalice of Christ. Unique Antonio Beltrán, professor of archaeology at the University of Zaragoza, noted that the cup is formed by a deep red agate, called “Oriental carnelian,” with streaks in the form of flames. By its material he asserts that it must come from a workshop in Palestine, Syria or Egypt between the fourth century B.C. and the first century A.D. The subsequent additions, such as the precious stones and the frame, date from the 13th or 14th century. Jorge Manuel Rodríguez, president of the Spanish Center for Sindonology, explained that although films have always shown “a wooden Holy Grail, […] that material did not comply with the norms of purification of the Jews.” Another element discussed by the scholars was the journey of the chalice from Rome to Valencia.

The experts affirmed that if the chalice arrived in Rome from Jerusalem, it was most likely taken by the Apostle Peter himself. Jaime Sancho, president of the liturgy commission of the Archdiocese of Valencia, presented a datum that supports the theory that the first popes celebrated the Eucharist with the same chalice that Jesus used. Sancho explained that in the Roman Canon, which dates back to the second century, it says literally at the moment of consecration “and, taking this glorious chalice in his holy and venerable hands,” instead of “the chalice.” This and other proofs contributed by Sancho demonstrate the existence in Rome of a unique chalice. This was affirmed by José Vicente Martínez, professor of ancient history at the University of Valencia, and American researcher Janice Bennet, doctor in Spanish literature. They both spoke about Pope Sixtus II, martyred in Rome during Valerian’s persecution, entrusting the Holy Grail to Deacon Lawrence to protect it from the emperor. A manuscript by St. Donatus told of this event, said Bennet, as well as the fact that Lawrence was a native of Valencia, not Huesca, as traditionally believed.

Several presenters gave historical proofs of the presence of the chalice in Spain over many centuries, from the study of various annals and paintings. German anthropologist Michael Hesemann stated that “as opposed to what many think, the grail legends did not begin with the Anglo-Saxon accounts of King Arthur, but in the rooted tradition that says that the chalice of the Last Supper was already in Spain in the Middle Ages.”

Faith and science The researchers were practically unanimous in supporting research on the chalice with modern scientific techniques to determine its origin, though they emphasized that its religious value does not depend on the resulting discoveries. Miguel Navarro, doctor in church history from Rome’s Gregorian University, stated that the chalice “is not a magical object, but consecrated by Jesus’ use of it and by the faith that perceives it as such, which has great religious value, regardless of the fact that it cannot be proved with absolute scientific certainty that it is the Lord’s chalice.” Relics, he added, are not “simple keepsakes, but something more valuable: palpable evidence of the reality of the human or historical event on which our faith is based, as salvation takes place in history, in the flesh.” Moreover, Father Manuel Carreira, doctor of physical sciences, added that science and faith “are not opposed.” However, he specified that “although science can give an explanation of all this, it cannot demonstrate anything literally about what happens in the Eucharist.” Navarro added that the chalice “insofar as relic, is beyond and above science, because its primordial significance belongs to the realm of faith, which does not mean that we approach it in an anti-scientific or fundamentalist way.” Rather, “we have the obligation to study it scientifically in its materiality.”

Benedict XVI used the chalice during the Mass with which he concluded the World Meeting of Families in Valencia in July, 2006. Pope John Paul II also used it in his visit to the city.

catholic.net/index.php?id=24353&option=zenit
Update me when site is updated


UFO involved in a dramatic incident

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Myths  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

A POLICE helicopter flying over Birmingham narrowly avoided tragedy when it nearly collided with a UFO, a report has claimed.

The pilot managed to swerve out of the mystery aircraft’s way while he was on a routine police surveillance task over the city centre earlier this year.

The helicopter was also carrying two police observers during the journey at around 9.50pm on May 2.

All three reported seeing an aircraft with two continuous blue/green lights – but were unable to identify what it was. The extraordinary incident is detailed in a document compiled by experts from the Airprox Board, which records near misses and reports them to the military and air traffic control units.

The report stated: “The front observer saw unidentified lights flying around their aircraft. The pilot established visual contact, as he manoeuvred the aircraft to avoid a collision and to identify the light source.”

The object was less than 100m away and flew around them. The pilot told the Airprox Board he thought the intent may either have been sinister or just someone messing around.

It was initially believed that the object was a radio controlled aircraft and that it was purposefully flown around the helicopter.

The report stated: “He (the pilot) believes the lights may have come from a radio controlled fixed wing aircraft, the lights being to assist with night flying.”

Despite searching the area with a thermal camera, the pilot was unable to find any signs of radio-controlled model activity.

And the British Model Flying Association ruled out the possibility, saying the mystery object was flying too high to be a miniature craft.

Leading expert Nick Pope, who previously worked for the Ministry of Defence’s UFO desk and is nicknamed the British Fox Mulder, told the Birmingham Mail today: “A helicopter was nearly blown out of the sky.

“This is a very disturbing incident which needs to be thoroughly investigated by the MoD and the Civil Aviation Authority as well as other near misses.

“The conclusion on the report is unsatisfactory especially when this aircraft came within seconds of a collision. It is a very interesting case especially when you look at the eyewitnesses. They are credible and reliable sources who have experience in night time flying.”

“This sighting clearly illustrates that whatever one believes about UFOs, this incident raises important air safety issues and should be taken seriously.”

birminghammail.net/news/birmingham-news/2008/11/21/

ufo-involved-in-a-dramatic-incident-97319-22310179

Update me when site is updated


Sasquatch Fingerprint ? ? ?

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

The source of the print is from a North Carolina human family of three, two adults who have one son. They own cats. One of their cats has appeared to have adopted a local Sasquatch family. When the cat insists upon getting out of the house, they know the Sasquatch, a family of four hairy hominids (e.g. Dad, Mom, one teenager, and a young child) are nearby.

The human residents set up a feeding location. It is a white lawn chair adjacent to the woods at the edge of the yard. The Sasquatch take the food. Sometimes, it is taken daily. Sometimes, it is not retrieved for a week. The food goes when the cat disappears, which is a good indication in this case.

Recently, in May 2008, one of the Sasquatch inspected the human father’s pickup truck, leaving fingerprints and nose prints on the passenger window. A local policeman was called. He collected the fingerprints and palm prints, a full set, but refused to date and sign the card because he “knew what we had” and would not allow his name to get involved with these events.

The humans have a video camera at the location. When it is working, the Sasquatch refuse to collect the food. When the camera quits, the Sasquatch resume their activity. Reportedly, the Sasquatch cannot affect the video or computer recording operations, but certainly they seem to know when the system works and when it quits.

There reportedly exists two fleeting videos of the Sasquatch and nothing more. One is the arm of the black Sasquatch father, and the other is the hand of the white teenager with pink skin.

cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/bf-fingerprint

Update me when site is updated


Possible UFO spotted in Central Austin

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Myths  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

The Austin Planetarium is now investigating some strange sights in the sky - caught on tape. An astronomy expert is calling them unidentified flying objects - UFOs.

Some men who live in a Central Austin apartment building say they’ve seen bizarre things in the sky for months, but lately it’s been more frequent. The men recorded their sightings on home video. Experts from the Austin Planetarium visited the apartment building area Friday night to see if they could also spot the objects.

Nothing appeared in the sky Friday that would convert any skeptics. But the home video show by Carl Lancaster and Doug McCullough may raise questions in some people’s minds.

“Sometimes they go fast, sometimes they go slow. They make no noise,” said McCullough.

McCullough and Lancaster aren’t sure what they captured on video. The executive director of the Austin Planetarium doesn’t know either.

“It doesn’t look like anything I can recognize,” said Torvald Hessel.

Hessel, an astronomer, says the objects don’t move like an airplane.

“There’s a military base close by, so that would be possible, and they are not going to tell you if they’re flying something special,” said Hessel.

But Hessel doesn’t think the shapes are weather balloons, comets, or shooting stars.

“It’s an unidentified flying object,” said Hessel. “I’m not saying it’s little green men at all. It’s just something we see flying in the air, and we don’t know what it is.”

The Austin Planetarium plans to try to enhance the video to see if some answers can be identified. The video enhancement will take a few days at least. In the meantime, Lancaster and McCullough say they’ll keep watching the sky.

Lancaster and McCullough say they first saw the objects back in April, then didn’t see them again until September. They tell CBS 42 they’ve consistently seen the objects since then.

keyetv.com/mostpopular/story.aspx?content_id=cd6c5a88-ae8e-4939-8672-55ddc0208983

Update me when site is updated


Hiding in Plain Sight

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

Imagine, if you will, an 8 foot giant hairy ape that weighs at least 500 pounds, has been known in ancient Native American folklore for centuries, and might possibly be the greatest cryptozoological enigma ever. It is known as Bigfoot, or Sasquatch north of the Canadian border, and it remains one of the true great mysteries of our time.

This creature roams the densest forests of the Pacific Northwest, is nocturnal, has a call that sounds like a baby crying, a woman screaming or unearthly howls unlike anything ever heard before, leaves footprints that a normal man could nearly fit two of his inside, and has been seen by virtually thousands of people. It has been filmed walking along a creek bank (and although controversial, has been authenticated by a number of research institutes as the real thing), has had hair and feces samples collected, has had voice analyzation done to it’s calls only proving the sounds are coming from no known identified animal, and to top all of this off, the county of Skamania in the state of Washington, has a law on the books forbidding anyone from killing it! Yet orthodox science says that this beast cannot possibly exist because there has been no actual body to examine. However, if this was a civil trial to prove the existence of this subject before a court of law, a verdict of existence would have come forward without the jury ever leaving the room! How strange can this be?

The crux of all this is that the scientific community needs to have a dead body before it recognizes a new species of animal. This is a long held practice that goes back to the early days of scientific research, back when people, hundreds of years ago, were telling tales of all sorts of beasts, with nary a one of those ever having even a smidgen of reality connected to it. Regardless, everyone was sworn to be real and they were duly accepted as such. Gargoyles, griffins, mermaids, boogie men, all were fairy tales made up to either scare or be scared of. There were no genuine physical traces or evidence of any kind, nothing except hearsay and a will to believe. Needless to say, that is all that these creatures were then and now, hearsay. So science established age-old boundaries regarding the cataloging of animals, actual proof that could be felt and examined instead of pondered and imagined. There was only one absolutely sure way to do that, and that was with something that could be put on the dissecting table. A body.

As with all myths, and they all were, each has been etched in our consciousness, and beckon our curiosity. But with Bigfoot, well, this is one of those myths that just don’t go away. In fact it has grown larger with time, and with the advent of modern technology, has in every aspect of evidence and research, virtually been proven real. But science still has its doubts. Besides the fact that there has been no body to examine, one of the biggest questions and controversies is how a creature this large can be alive and yet remain hidden for such a long time? People actually scoff at the notion that an animal so large could remain hidden on such a densely populated continent such as America. There is just no way possible they will tell you.

When you think about it, how could a creature like this exist in the first place, and then even if it does exist, remain undetectable as well? Tall, wide, heavy, not on first glance a very hideable animal. We think hiding is for small animals like mice and rabbits, birds, snakes and things like that. To be large and able to hide you need to have an effective form of camouflage and an area large enough to use it. This would include stripes to hide in tall grass, a tawny color to blend in with the black, white and gray scenery that your prey sees, or the dark backs and light undersides of the largest whales to mimic the dark water and the sky, respectively. All of these animals exhibit good camouflage and blend in extremely well with the environment that they live in. But when one considers Bigfoot, that notion appears to be way out to lunch in the hiding category. Or are they?

From what we know, if this creature exists at all, it is nocturnal. It also lives in the deepest part of the forest where only the largest and heftiest trees live along with it. It is dark furred, and walks silently when around people, as almost no encounter ever puts a Bigfoot as being noisy unless it is fleeing or wants to be heard. As we begin to envision this picture as a whole, our friend Sasquatch subtly begins to blend in and disappear.

Have you ever walked in a wood at night? No light or other form of illumination, just the stars and the moon as your guide? Try it for some eye opening revelations. Any woods will do, even thick brush or bushes separating suburban yards. Even with a flashlight, the beam only penetrates just so far into the darkness, casting shadows that make the eye see things that aren’t really there, and hiding things that really are. Beyond that beam of light is infinity, and the infinity out there in the darkness is the home of Bigfoot. Out there where size and heft no longer matter, where being as big and as wide as a tree is the best form of camouflage any creature could have in the woods. And I mean any woods. Dark fur resembling tree bark adds to the confusion of the visual senses, and just as suddenly as a creature was there, it has now vanished.

I had to prove this had at least a bit of truth to it. Being able to hide in plain sight could be such an advantage to a creature of this size and bulk, and could perhaps be one of the reasons why it is rarely seen and even more rarely photographed. Researchers continue to make treks out into the wilderness, yet more often than not, they do not return with any truly tangible evidence. Many is the tale of being followed and watched, knowing something is out there, but unless the creature wants someone to see it, they never will. I decided to test this theory that one can hide in plain sight, just to see if I could disappear like a Sasquatch. I wanted to prove to the naysayers that a creature like this could remain hidden, regardless of whether people were out looking for it, or our civilization was crowding it.

Dressing in my best black commando uniform, and blackening my face with charcoal, I attempted to make myself look like a smaller version of BF. Being 6 foot tall and about 220 pounds, there is no way that I even vaguely fit the characteristics of a giant hairy gorilla, this I will readily admit. On the other hand, no giant hairy gorilla would dare endeavor to make a fool of themselves, if they had been discovered during the attempt, so I figured that this made us about even. Looking like this, I went to a local sub-division bordered by a small woodland. Not even a thick woods, more like scattered trees with scrub brush everywhere. This wooded area bordered nicely manicured lawns, expensive houses, and access roads. Then, to make this as real as possible, I made sure that it was dark, too.

It was a warm spring evening when I tried this, so the ground foliage was well sprouted but still patchy in spots, and the trees were pretty much all leafed out. In the daylight, anyone could see pretty deeply into this tangle of greenery, and unless you were dog or cat sized, a human’s presence would be fairly apparent, at least out to about 50 feet or so. After that, it became increasingly more difficult to see deeper as the brush began to quickly obscure usable vision. Hiding and getting anywhere near this civilization would have been virtually impossible, but just remember, this was during the day.

After dark it was a totally different story. No matter who or how many people could see you, once you penetrated not more than 5 feet into the depths of woodland, your form almost completely disappeared. This is where I decided to begin my research, a little past that 5 foot mark.

Entering the brush down a bit from the actual sub-division, I moved through the wooded area inside the tree line, walking quietly, but not gingerly, slowly making my way past house after house and yard after yard. A few yards ahead of me was a gathering of people, some sort of yard party, maybe 20 or so genuine humans, and I moved along steadily in that direction. This would be a critical test of my theory as there were so many eyes and so many lights, I almost could not imagine remaining invisible.

They were making enough noise to mask any sound that I made, so I didn’t have to worry about stepping on and breaking branches, and when I did that, no one could hear it at all. I moved directly in front of the party, out in the scrub, blending with the trees and the shadows, standing there for a good half-hour literally daring someone to see me, but no one noticed. My estimate put me between 7 and 10 feet behind the tree line, and even at that small amount of distance, I was positively invisible. One couple walked hand in hand towards the trees and stopped directly in front of me, so close that I could hear their whispers and their breathing. My heart pounded, and I thought for sure they would hear that, but this couple stayed occupied with each other and after a few minutes finally went back to the party. I had been standing in front of a tree, but sideways to mimic the way it stood, brush and other plants covering my legs, shadows of scrub breaking up my silhouette. However, in actuality, my entire upper torso was completely exposed to view. Still, no one noticed and I’ll wager that everyone who looked out that way saw me as the tree and never gave it a second glance, the hand in hand couple as well.

After this little episode, and with my heart pumping a bit slower, I decided to try moving, first going deeper into the woods away from people and then moving sideways. Filled with a bit of anxiety at first, I soon found out that both ways were easy. Going away, I just made sure I kept in front of a tree, and when I moved, I went behind it first, and then to the front of the next one, quietly yet deliberately. No one was the wiser.

Moving parallel was even easier. I picked out a tree, no matter how thick or thin, and moving from behind one, I took a few easy gliding steps and moved behind another one. I always stood sideways behind these trees making sure my silhouette was as small as it could be. Although I broke some branches, moved clumsily at times, and even tripped over a branch and fell once to all fours, I remained virtually invisible.

After I had proven to myself how truly easy it was to remain unseen only a few yards out, I was filled with a bit more confidence, so I had to take this show on the road. Literally. I moved out of that wooded area, made my way out to the adjoining highway, and found a rather large tree that I could stand behind as traffic went by. I stood behind this tree with traffic whizzing past at near 60 miles per hour, and there was absolutely no reaction. So I stood sideways against the tree and with blackface reflecting not a shred of light, there once again was no reaction. It was not until I broke free from the influence of the tree where I was casting a different shadow that people saw me and began to slow down. Some flashed lights to see what this crazy person in all black was doing out there next to the highway. But once again, as soon as I blended with my surroundings in the darkness, I became completely invisible.

I don’t at all claim that this was scientific at any rate, and please don’t try this at home kiddies. It just seemed to me that a total novice in a woodland setting, that uses a little makeup for camouflage, and walks around on the edge of civilization, can literally remain hidden from view even when people are looking. Although elementary and a bit amateurish to be sure, what I accomplished gives a good indication that if a creature was present in a wilderness and didn’t want to be seen, it would be a fairly easy task to avoid detection. Particularly if was at night, among large trees, with dark colored fur, anywhere on the American continent. I would be willing to bet that one could hide nearly anything from eyesight in those surroundings, so long as you made it look like a tree in the darkness. And after all, isn’t that exactly what a Sasquatch imitates?

This whole purpose was to contest all of the knowledgeable people the world over, who continue to insist that a creature as large and as hefty as Bigfoot, could not possibly be where it is purported to be. However, the reality as I have attempted to prove, shows that Sasquatch is a creature perfectly camouflaged within its native surroundings. Even suburban tree lots and scrub brush are enough to hide a full grown BF after dark. Couple that adaptation with an inherent behavior of stealth and reclusiveness, add in a high degree of intellect, and you come up with an animal that can, quite literally, disappear right before your very eyes and hide in plain sight.

cryptozoology.com/articles/plainsight

Update me when site is updated


The Bloodless Vampire

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters, Myths  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

In the west, we tend to categorize everything. We try to come up with rules and regulations that define what something is, sometimes to desperate lengths and great frustration when something just doesn’t fit. Mythical creatures are no exception. We view the vampire as a blood drinking undead human, and a werewolf as a living human that can take a wolf-like form and ravage the population like an animal. In Eastern Europe, the homeland of most folklore relating to the vampire and werewolf, these lines can become hopelessly blurred, and the creatures can become almost the same.

Take the vrykolakas, the Greek version of the Vampire. While most vampire legends tend to involve drinking human blood as part of the mythos, in this case, it does not. The vrykolakas comes into being simply after living a sacrilegious life, or after an excommunication or burial in ground that was not consecrated, or most ominously eating mutton that had been previously tasted by a werewolf. Speaking of, even a werewolf couldn’t be safe from becoming a vrykolakas, if you killed the greek werewolf, he could come back as a cross between a vrykolakas and a werewolf! The fusion of these two creatures in Greek culture is one of the most fascinating aspects of the vrykolakas-style vampire.

Once in existance, the vrykolakas would not bite the neck of his victims to draw blood, rather it would cause epidemics of disease by simply walking around town. It would knock on doors, only to dissappear if the person answered on the first knock, but that person would then be condemned to death soon after and would become a vrykolakas themselves. To this day in certain parts of Greece, people do not answer the door until at least the second knock.

Even poltergeist activity is blamed on the vrykolakas, though that may be off-base in that the poltergeist is likely a completely different phenomenon. Sleep paralysis is also pinned on the legend, as a sort of fusion between the concept of the incubus and the Balkan vampire’s penchant for killing victims by sitting on their chest. Methods of dispensing with a vrykolakas are much the same as the western concept of the vampire; impaling. But there are other methods for this creature that work just as well, such as cremating the suspected corpse and even a standard exorcism is said to do the trick.

The vrykolakas is just one of many different variations of legendary undead creatures that resemble the western concept of the vampire. Perhaps, when dealing with folklore, we should take this into account. Imagine a film based on the vrykolakas instead of the western vampire, with powers greatly expanded from simple blood-drinking and wandering in the night.

paranormala.com/bloodless-vampire

Update me when site is updated


`Bigfoot’ expert says creature is alive and well in U.S. wilderness

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comment (1)  |  Add Comment

KANSAS CITY, Mo. _ Larry Battson has seen the smirks, the winks, the rolling of the eyes.

But that doesn’t bother him in the least. When you profess to believe in Bigfoot, that comes with the territory.

“When I used to talk about Bigfoot at sports shows, I’d have skeptics,” said Battson, a nationally known educator on wildlife, who was displaying rattlesnakes and other reptiles at the Kansas City, Mo., Sportshow last week.

“I’d have `good old boys’ come up and say `What are you trying to feed us?’ But I’d always tell them, `You believe what you want to believe. I’m convinced it exists.’”

Call it what you like _ Bigfoot, Sasquatch, Yeti, the Abominable Snowman _ it’s out there, Battson says.

He’s convinced that secretive, mysterious, apelike creatures inhabit the deep forests of the United States. He and others describe them as 7 to 10 feet tall, weighing more than 500 pounds, with feet 20 to 25 inches long. They are covered in brown hair, walk on two feet and have a pronounced brow ridge, believers claim.

They are highly intelligent, keeping to themselves and offering only fleeting exposure to humans. That explains why they are so seldom seen and why scientific proof of their existence is so scarce, believers say.

But many, including the scientific community, remain unconvinced. If colonies of this Bigfoot creature do indeed exist, they say, get us the documentation.

There is a distant, grainy photo of a supposed Bigfoot taken in 1967 by Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin, two men who say they ran across the creature in a remote part of northern California. But that’s it.

Since then, there have been proven hoaxes and much skepticism.

“In all the time I’ve been with the Conservation Department, I’ve never heard an agent talk about a Bigfoot sighting,” said Brian Bartlett, a conservation agent with the Missouri Department of Conservation. “With all the hunters we have out in the woods and with all the trail cameras that are set out these days, you’d think someone would spot one if they do exist.

“But we’ve learned to never say never.”

Battson has heard such skepticism before. Be he remains undeterred.

He has been studying Bigfoot for about 30 years now, traveling the country to research alleged sightings.

He has taken molds of footprints, he has audiotape of the sounds the creatures make in the wild, he has read journals of families that had close encounters with them, and he has mountains of testimony from people who claimed to have seen the primate. He spotted what may have been a Bigfoot, but he isn’t certain.

One of those testimonies came from his wife, who spotted what she believed to be a Bigfoot in the headlights of her car as she returned to the Battsons’ home in rural Indiana one night.

That sighting came as no surprise to her husband. There have been other alleged spottings in Putnam County, Ind., where the couple lives.

“These aren’t just a few crackpots making up stories,” said Battson, 55, who lives in Clinton Falls, Ind. “There are literally hundreds of people across the nation who have reported seeing Bigfoot.

“In fact, the only states where there haven’t been sightings are Hawaii and Rhode Island.”

Battson first became intrigued with Bigfoot when he talked with noted wildlife researcher Jim Fowler of the “Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom” television show years ago.

Fowler was in Russia to tape footage of the brown bear, but all the guides wanted to talk about was Bigfoot.

“Jim said it was very convincing,” Battson said. “These guides got a good look at this creature, and they were afraid of it.”

Battson runs Battson Wildlife Educational Services, a nonprofit organization dedicated to educating people about wildlife. He has a collection that includes everything from snakes and Gila monsters to tarantulas.

When he heard about this mysterious creature supposedly roaming the woods, it piqued his interest.

“I look at Bigfoot as just another form of wildlife,” he said. “That’s why I find it so fascinating.”

Battson began looking into reports of Bigfoot sightings and was intrigued by what he found.

The creature was mentioned in early American Indian writings and in the journal of explorer Daniel Boone. Even President Theodore Roosevelt related in one of his books an account of Idaho trappers’ encounters with a Bigfoot.

“I read one account of miners in the 1920s who encountered a Bigfoot and shot at it,” Battson said. “That night, their cabin was just bombarded with rocks and boulders. They thought it might have been retaliation for what they had done.

“Anyway, they were so scared that they just took off and left.”

But the modern-day accounts are just as fascinating to Battson.

He remembers one incident when a group reported being out searching for mushrooms when they heard some sounds in the brush. When the sounds grew louder, as if they were being followed, they made their way back to their vehicle.

As they went to pull away, what they thought to be a Bigfoot pounced on the hood of their vehicle, made some menacing sounds and then bounded away.

But perhaps the most memorable sighting Battson has investigated involved a family that was building a house in a remote area where Bigfoot creatures had allegedly been seen before.

“When the house was being built, something kept vandalizing it,” Battson said. “At first, this man thought it was kids.

“But one night he saw this big hairy creature out there on his land. He told me that it even came up and screamed in his window one time.

“Over time, I think things got better, and now they kind of coexist there. But that guy tells me he has his land lit up like Shea Stadium now.”

Battson has read dozens of such accounts and has talked with many of the people who said they had spotted Bigfoot. He has seen the footprints in the woods and the way tree limbs have been thrashed at a level higher than any other animal could reach.

That’s enough to convince him that this mysterious creature does indeed exist.

“People say, `If this Bigfoot is out there, why don’t we find carcasses in the woods?’” Battson said. “But think about it. There are millions of animals out there, but how many times do we run across a carcass?

“I believe that this creature is highly intelligent and able to sense danger. That’s why we don’t run across them that often.

“But I’m convinced they’re out there.”

Battson paused and added, “Either this is the greatest hoax ever pulled off, or there really is a Bigfoot.”

talonmarks.com/life/1.734767

Update me when site is updated


Cryptozoology

Author: MandM Admin  |  Category: Monsters  |  Comments (0)  |  Add Comment

Cryptozoology is the study of creatures that are rumored to exist. But for true believers and alleged eyewitnesses, these “cryptids” are alive and well and lurking among us.

  • Marozi: With a maned lion’s face fronting a jaguar-like body, the Marozi (also known as the spotted lion) was reported several times in the 1930s in Kenya’s mountains but hasn’t been mentioned much since. The Natural History Museum in Great Britain is said to be in possession of the spotted skin of a marozi, but many experts think the specimen represents a jaguar that bred with common spotless plains lions.
  • Kamchatka Giant Bear: Swedish zoologist Sten Bergman, working in Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula in the 1920s, discovered a paw print that measured a full square foot, suggesting a bear of remarkable size. Similar sightings tell of an ursine almost twice the size of a typical North American grizzly bear, measuring six feet at the shoulder. Some Russian biologists believe there is a small group of Kamchatka Giant Bears that survived the most recent ice age.
  • Skunk Ape: Bigfoot’s smelly Southern cousin has been reported a number of times in Florida’s swamps, most convincingly in 2000 by a couple who took an excellent snapshot of what looked to be a six-foot-six orangutan. The picture didn’t capture its scent, of course, but the couple attested to its atrocity.
  • Lizard Man: This scaly green hominid, the resident mysterious beast of Escape Ore Swamp in South Carolina, has long been at the center of local lore. While many consider the creature a hoax, others swear they’ve encountered it face to face. Lizard Man has had several brushes with fame: A local radio station once offered $1 million for a live capture, and in 1988, a South Carolina Republican leader labeled Lizard Man a staunch Democrat.
  • Jersey Devil: According to most reports, New Jersey’s cryptozoological curiosity has wings, a horse’s face, a pig’s hooves, and a kangaroo’s body. The legend of the Jersey Devil was born in the 1700s–based on a tale of a cursed baby-turned-demon that flew off into the night–and boomed in the early 1900s, with supposed sightings all over the state. To this day, people report Devil sightings, mostly in the spooky Pine Barrens of southern New Jersey. While some locals think the creature is truly a supernatural beast, others say it’s probably a misidentified sandhill crane.
  • El Chupacabra: Puerto Rico’s legendary “goat sucker” is a fanged and clawed beast that performs vampirism on livestock. The first accounts of its victims–often goats, chickens, horses, and cows–were reported in the 1950s by farmers who found animals drained of blood, with several large puncture marks. Some who have allegedly sighted the creature describe it as a short, kangaroo-like monster with oversize teeth and an oval head, but others liken it to a large reptile or bat.
  • Tessie: Deep in Lake Tahoe on the California-Nevada border lurks a storied sea creature that’s the Sierra Nevada cousin of the Loch Ness Monster. It’s alleged that after a submarine expedition, undersea explorer Jacques Cousteau said, “The world isn’t ready for what’s down there.” (He could, of course, have been referring to anything odd.) Popular descriptions portray Tessie as either a freshwater relative of a whale or a 20-foot sea serpent with a humped back.
  • Champ: Like Tessie, Champ is named for the body of water in which it purportedly lurks, in this case New York’s Lake Champlain. Several hundred recorded sightings typically describe the beast as an angular black sea monster measuring about 50 feet in length. One investigative group believes the often-sighted Champ is actually a surviving plesiosaur, a dinosaur that died off 60 million years ago.

animals.howstuffworks.com/animal-facts/cryptozoology.htm

Update me when site is updated